Hello everyone! I have good news for those of you with newer macs (OS X 10.7 or above) who have been having problems with getting cheat codes working for your copy of BioShock. I know I’ve had several of you come to my office hours, where we messed around and looked for the User.ini file, sometimes to no avail. When we did find it, we ran into all sorts of issues with not being able to alter the files! Well, we may have a solution to that now.
Cheers to John in my last class of the day, who clued us in to this fix. Apparently, in that BioShock Options window that pops up when you start BioShock (the one with the button you need to click that says “Play”), there is a tab called “Advanced.” On this tab is a button that says something like “Change Options” or “Change Settings”–I don’t know exactly what, because of course I didn’t write the exact words down, and this button doesn’t exist on my version of the game. (I imagine many of you have surmised that my version of the mac operating system is a few years older than most of yours.)
When you click on this, it will apparently allow you to access the files just like you would if you had been able to follow the tutorial I provided for you. The “MacInit” folder is in there, and in it the User.ini file. (If you cannot find User.ini, you can also edit the DefUser.ini file, which is the same thing except for the fact that it sets the default. This means that if you use a cheat that causes the game to crash, you may need to delete it later. But you should be just fine using the Godmode cheat. This should help many of you out, as I know that gameplay takes much longer when you’re constantly fending off all those pesky Splicers.
I also have some new information regarding how to use Saved Games for both Windows and Mac users. It appears that, unlike on my computers, for most of you, simply double-clicking the .bsb (BioShock Saved Game) file doesn’t actually work. So here’s how to fix this issue for most of you.
In Mac, the saved games will be located in that folder you access by clicking that “Change Settings” (or whatever it is) button that you use to get to the MacInit folder and User.ini file. It should just be a folder called “SaveGames.” See if you might be able to drag and drop anything into that folder. I obviously can’t try this–be aware that it just may not work. If you want to experiment with it, though, remember that I can help you after class or during my office hours. The worst that can happen is that we monkey with it for a few minutes and discover that we’re at an impasse, but no matter what, I’m happy to help.
For you Windows users, the most likely place that the saved games will be located is in your Documents folder, in a folder named BioShock. You should be able to simply drag and drop the saved games you download from Niihka into that file.
In both cases, the way you’ll access the saved games is to open BioShock and click the “Load Game” option on the main screen. Now here’s a think about BioShock and saved games. It’s not going to have the same name as the file. I named the files so you could tell them apart easily when you downloaded them, but the way BioShock classifies saved games is through date, time, and area. So here are the dates and timestamps of all the saved games I offered you, so you can tell them apart when you load them into BioShock.
A note about my saved games: because I was playing with Godmode and other cheats, and because I was playing in the interest of speed instead of completion, I wasn’t collecting lots of money, ammo, plasmids, ADAM, etc in this play-through. I did not kill Big Daddies unless I had to, and I only rescued one or two Little Sisters. I even ignored a lot of audio diaries, so you’ll want to really refer to the BioShock Wiki for those. I also didn’t do much weapons and plasmid upgrading, so my weapons and plasmids are a tad weak. This is absolutely fine if you’re playing with GodMode, but it may make life difficult for some of you if you can’t get the cheats to work. The good news that in Easy mode, money and ammo are pretty easy to find. The issue of getting ADAM, though, is a bit different. To be honest, though, my gameplay style doesn’t include a lot of plasmid use, so it is possible to get through the game with only the main three plasmids (Incinerate!, Telekinesis, and ElectroBolt).
Feb 05 2013 4:45:50 PM Medical Pavilion
This saved game will load into the Medical Pavilion area, at the point in the game right before you need to deal with Steinman.
Feb 05 2013 5:54:02 PM Neptune’s Bounty
This one will take you to the point right before you give Peach the photos. If you play up until Peach gives you the quest, and then you load this game, it’ll take out all of that tedious going around and finding Spider Splicers to take pictures of.
This is a very short level. Just play through it.
I’ve got a few different saved games for you for Arcadia.
Mar 21 2013 8:25:07 PM Arcadia
This brings you through the twists and turns of Arcadia, right to the point where something interesting starts to happen to the trees. I don’t really suggest using this one to skip ahead unless you’re finding Arcadia very confusing. You’ll miss a lot of stuff with it.
Mar 21 2013 8:48:41 PM Arcadia
This save allows you to completely skip the Farmer’s Market level. I still suggest that you wander around in there a bit, but this way you won’t have to spend all that time looking for the components of the Lazarus Vector. When you load this save, you have all the components. Simply invent the Lazarus Vector in the U-Invent machine right in front of you, and put it in the Central Misting Control unit.
Feb 05 2013 07:24:52 PM Arcadia
After you activate the Lazarus Vector in the mister, you have to hold down the fort while waves of Splicers attack. This save game will allow you to skip that. Useful if you’re not interested in dealing with the stress of fighting all those enemies.
Mar 13 2013 9:44:35 PM Fort Frolic
This is right after you’ve finished the “masterpiece” for Sandor Cohen. Another one of those saves that helps you avoid doing the little “oh, go get me these items” side quest.
Mar 13 2013 10:28:07 PM Hephaestus
After you get the mission to go to Heat Loss Monitoring and you find the EMP bomb, you can load this game to have it finished. Make sure you do explore Hephaestus, but finding all the components for this bomb is rather annoying.
There’s nothing terribly difficult involved with any of these levels except getting from place to place. Godmode cheat highly recommended for these, though, since there are a fair number of enemies. If you start having trouble with these levels, come to me.
Mar 13 2013 11:43:38 PM Point Prometheus
This save allows you to skip the part where you have to gather all the components for the Big Daddy suit. As before, you should explore this level, but this will just cut down on time.
Mar 13 2013 11:58:08 PM Proving Grounds
Here, you’re finished with the Proving Grounds, and you’re about to get an ADAM gatherer from a little sister. And from there . . . well, you can’t save during the last level, so you’re on your own after this.
One note about this–Godmode doesn’t seem to work. So you’re actually going to have to fight for this one. Make sure you’re fully stocked on Health packs (fortunately, in my Saved Games, I’ve got plenty for you), and have as much ammo as possible. There is one cheat that works here called PlayersOnly, which freezes all your enemies in place but allows you to move around. I found this cheat VERY useful for the end battle. Otherwise, just give him all you’ve got with your weapons, drain his ADAM as soon as he goes back to his “recharging station” thing, and use the health packs to make sure you don’t die!
We’re coming around to midterms now, and for an English class this usually means revision: developing our rough pieces of Inquiry Two material into fully fledged, five page (or more) papers. In the coming week and a half, we’ll be talking about how to add to your analysis, how to use your outside sources more effectively, and how to polish it up so your main argument will dazzle your readers.
You may also be engaging in another type of revision at this time: re-working your Inquiry One draft to score a better grade on it. If you left your works cited page off and are just after the five points lost from that, then bring in your graded copy of Inquiry One with the works cited added to it, and I’ll add those points. If you’re looking for more points in the content area of the paper, though, you’ll have more work in store for you. Come talk to me in the next week about revising, and have a plan ready to present to me. What are you going to revise in your paper and how are you going to go about it? Once we’re on the same wavelength about your revision strategies, I can give you the go ahead and we’ll set a due date for your revision.
You don’t have to be alone in the revision process, though, for either Inquiry One or Inquiry Two. Remember that I’m a resource, and I can offer guidance to you if you pop in during my office hours. It’s helpful if you have a draft or some jotted-down ideas we can discuss, but otherwise I’m always willing to help. You can also consult with your classmates and offer comments on each others’ drafts. Remember to leave the actual writing up to the writer, though! Offer suggestions and specific strategies to your friends, but let them come up with exactly how to apply them to their papers. That way you’ll all avoid plagiarism issues.
Lastly, the Howe Writing Center is there to help. You can set up an appointment, or go to one of the conveniently-scheduled revision workshops this week! There are two up for offer:
Apologies to those of you who scoured my blog last night looking for this post. Last night I was attacked by the Evil Headache of Doom and was forced to beat a hasty retreat into a nice, dark, quiet cave. So here it is now. We’ll pretend I’m writing a paper on postmodern features of writing style in The Road.
Banco, Lindsey. “Contractions in Cormac McCarthy’s The Road.” The Explicator 68.4 (2010): 276-79. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 14 Feb. 2013.
This article explicates McCarthy’s use of contractions in The Road. The lack of apostrophes in negative contractions, Banco notes, is in keeping with the minimalist style of the book as a whole, a style she and other critics attribute to a reflection of the bleakness (she uses the word “nihilism”) of the world in The Road. However, she notes that the preservation of accepted style in positive contractions serves as a balance to bleakness and an emphasis of the importance of remembering one’s humanity. Although not a rigorous, multi-sourced contextual critique of the work, this explication is well done in a scholarly tone, and was published in a respected journal, and therefore is quite appropriate for academic use. In my paper, this can provide another person’s view on the purpose of McCarthy’s deliberate deviation from accepted writing practices, especially as, though I agree with Banco’s idea that keeping an apostrophe is meant to hold back the tide of bleakness, a reader is actually going to find more emphasis in the lack of one, which reinforces the bleakness rather than the preservation of human identity.
That’s it. Some of your annotations will be shorter than others, as generally the length of an annotation is fairly proportionate to just how much useful information is in the source.
One further note about blogs, this time in regards to your ones on reading: if you’ve noticed that you lost a few points on your last couple of blogs, it is either because your blogs have been significantly short, or because you haven’t been selecting, quoting (or describing in detail), and close reading a specific section of one of the texts for the week. Go back and look at my original example if you’re unsure of what I mean.
So we’re moving into Inquiry Two territory quite earnestly now, which means it’s time for you to start really thinking about what you want to write about for your next major assignment. For those of you who think you might want to write about Slaughterhouse-Five, I know this seems a bit premature. Yes, you don’t know the whole story yet, but you don’t actually need to know everything that happens in the book to at least start to poke around for context. Considering a book from different angles and contexts is an ongoing process, and it takes place both during and after your first reading. Your opinions about certain angles on the book may change as you learn new things about it, but you can also trust your instincts early on about what’s important. Remember, we’re educated readers, and we pick up on more things than we often give ourselves credit for.
Finding a topic, as I mentioned in class, begins with knowing what you’re interested in, both in the book itself and in terms of possible contextual angles. Keep your personal interests in mind. For example, I’m interested in societal gender constructs and science fiction, so I tend to focus on both in my academic studies. Think about what classes you’ve been enjoying so far in college, and what you’ve learned in them. Are there things you can apply to the literature we’ve been reading?
Once you have a broad topic you think would be cool to research and apply to either The Road or Slaughterhouse-Five, it’s time to research. We’ll learn how to do this tomorrow at the library, but keep in mind that you’re not only researching outside the text, but also looking for clues inside the text that relate to your topic. Gather them together. Do you see a pattern? How does the outside context play an important role in the book? How do we understand the book differently when we hold it up next to the context? Answer these questions and you’ll have the “what” and the “how” of a thesis.
Some of you may already know what your topic is going to be. Others of you may still be playing around with ideas. We’re still in the early stages of Inquiry Two, so this is not a problem. But if you’re looking for some guidance, here are some questions that could help you find possible paper angles. These are not the only angles, of course, so remember there are other literary theories you could apply, and other contexts you can examine these texts from.
Keep in mind that as we keep reading, we’ll come up with more of these.
Hello everyone, and happy Friday! So, as I mentioned in class, through the semester I will be updating this blog periodically to include my musings about our texts, including bits and pieces I’ve remembered from class discussion, interesting things I’ve noted in your blogs, etc. Occasionally I may link to your blogs as I do my own thing here, so remember the writing you do in these blogs doesn’t have to be formal, but it is certainly produced in a public space for a public audience. So keep the rhetorics of reaching your audience at the back of your mind as you do these posts.
This post is going to be a sort of hybrid of me noting important things and instructions for your reading blogs, and me actually writing a reading blog for you to use as a model. Early on, I don’t think you should worry too much about doing your reading blogs “wrong.” If I’d like you to do something a bit different, I’ll tell you, but I’m likely to forgive any confusion early on in the semester, so you won’t have to worry about losing points just yet. That sort of thing comes into play later, when we’ve settled in and know the expectations for proper completion of work.
So, every week (usually on Monday, but on Wednesday for week 2), you’ll be posting in your blog. Each blog will cover the text we talked about in class on the previous Wednesday, and the texts we will be talking about for that Monday. So in essence you’ll be reporting on, reflecting on, and reacting to what we talked about in class on Wednesday, and “priming the pump” for class discussion on Monday. Now, you need only focus on our primary texts—that is, the fiction we’re reading. If one of the other readings strikes you as really cool and important, then you are always welcome to include it, but I’m not requiring it.
Reading blogs are a mixture of personal reaction and close reading. About half of your post should be devoted to discussing your reaction and general feelings about a text, and the other half should be focused on examining some specific part of the text—either a short passage (of one small paragraph or a few sentences), or even just one sentence if you can glean enough meaning from it. Relate the passage to the text as a whole and pinpoint interesting literary features in it.
Okay, so now that I’ve outlined what goes into one of these posts, it’s time for me to actually do one. Please keep in mind that in this post, I’m only going to look at “Ponies,” since I want to keep my thoughts about the other two stories to myself for now. That way my ideas won’t creep into your Inquiry One papers, and you guys will get the joy of working toward your own opinions of these texts.
I find Kij Johnson’s “Ponies” to be delightfully savage. And no, not just because of the concept of little girls maiming ponies that are very much portrayed as symbolic extensions of themselves. (Symbols of exactly what, though, I’m still unsure.) The tone of this work is juvenile and somehow “preppy” like the girls the story portrays, and Johnson is not holding back with the underlying meaning of this one. This is pure allegory, and satire at its most cutting. There are no parts of this story that we would usually think of as “laugh-out-loud” funny.
In fact, this story is so uncompromising that many have very mixed feelings about it. Just read the comments section at Tor.com. Many there say they don’t want to like the story partly because they see the truth in it, but the revelation of the story’s “aboutness” makes them respect it all the same. A few others simply can’t get past the heavy-handedness of the allegory, which is a valid criticism. One could wonder if Johnson was a bit too obvious in places, but I think this story in any other context would be a major flop. Imagine trying to read a story with the same concept, but with realistic characters and details. I’m just not sure it would work for me. It would probably just devolve into the genre of horror instead of making its point.
Overall, the “aboutness” I get from this story is, as many people have mentioned in class so far, the danger of changing oneself in order to fit in. The groups that would demand this change, the story suggests, are not worth being a part of, and the damage to oneself may become far more than expected, as we see with Sunny. Once she’s gone too far to turn back, another demand is leveled, and then it’s too late—she must conform or lose everything.
But this interpretation is, I think, just scratching the surface. There are multiple themes here: the politics of childhood (from the perspective of girls), the limitation of female expression, and a hint of criticism for society’s conception of “femaleness” as a whole. This last one sticks out to me the most, probably because feminist theory is a major focus of my own scholarly work. Of course, this isn’t just the over-working of a brain trained for finding arbitrary feminist readings in texts—the text itself supports this reading as an undercurrent of subtext throughout.
In order to become accepted members of society—ie, fit in with “TheOtherGirls”—women and girls learn early on that they must alter themselves to conform to an expected (and accepted) image of femininity. They must change their appearance and maintain it scrupulously, must change their behavior in order to fit into the niche of what is all right for a girl. Take the image of Sunny’s cutting, for example:
It’s not the way it would be, cutting a real pony. The wing comes off easily, smooth as plastic, and the blood smells like cotton candy at the fair. There’s a shiny trembling oval where the wing was, as if Barbara is cutting rose-flavored Turkish Delight in half and sees the pink under the powdered sugar. She thinks,It’s sort of pretty, and throws up.
The use of “real” here in the first sentence is vexing. Clearly these Ponies are real in the context of this story, although they don’t fit our conception of what “real” ponies are. But Sunny plainly feels pain, so I think something else is going on here. There are clues, apart from the tone of the text, that the narrator is buying into this idea of the “cutting-out” as a necessary price for inclusion. (Sidenote: “cutting-out,” “coming-out” . . . I hadn’t noticed this before, but I’m really thinking it’s intentional.)
So if the Ponies are an extension of the girls’ personality and feminine self-expression, then it makes sense that anyone invested in the idea of paring this part of themselves down would also buy into the idea that it’s not really themselves being hurt. After all, Barbara isn’t cutting herself with that knife, right? (Well, wrong, but you get the psychology behind the issue.)
Then there’s the details of the cutting. The cutting of the wing is described as “smooth as plastic,” giving me a striking image of someone cutting parts off a Barbie doll. (Which is interesting . . . Barbie, Barbara . . . not sure what it means, to be honest. Must investigate further!) We also consider plastic things to be fake, so once again we’re getting the idea that Sunny isn’t real, and at the same time we’ve got an image of femininity: plasticness, the idea of altering oneself into the context of fakeness. (And isn’t that what we like to call the girls who are the epitome of the popular embodiment of American femininity, “fake”?)
Okay, this is getting long (hovering at about 800 words just for the part talking about Ponies), so I’ll just note the last line of the passage. Yes, it is sort of pretty. We are certainly taught to feel that altering oneself to embody the ideal notion of “female” is pretty, but it’s also (underneath the surface) ultimately harmful. We recognize this even as we internalize the “prettiness” of it all—hence Barbara throwing up.
There’s so much more in the story, and please don’t take my reading as the ultimate Word on the text. Also notice something: a reading journal is an invention activity. What I have done here is basically a type of focused freewriting and annotation. It’s more than idle observation of a text, but it’s not quite formal, paper-worthy close reading yet. It’s jumbled, I’m not sure what everything means yet, etc, etc. It’s a step in the right direction, though, and I could certainly use it to start a paper, so keep this in mind as you write your own posts.